Skip to main content

The Law of Forensic Accounting


I agree with the statement that “It is extremely important for Forensic Accountants to be familiar with the law.” When a case reaches the courts, the forensic accountant may need to become an expert witness (Sanchez & Zhang, 2012). Accounting expert witnesses in Australia are bound by APES215 and any other relevant court procedure rules (APESB, 2008). A competent expert must make sure any relevant information within their area of expertise is identified and communicated as soon as possible to prepare the legal team (APESB, 2008). The expert must understand that their independence and objectivity is of the upmost importance.

APES215 guides forensic accountants in being able to distinguish between their legal and ethical requirements. The legal requirements of a forensic accountant involve complying with the laws of evidence and communicating findings as soon as possible. The ethical requirements as stated by CPA Australia’s policy adviser is to “act in the public interest and comply with the code of ethics and its principles” (Head, 2017).

In 1997, Brian Quinn, the former chief executive and chairman of Coles Myer was found guilty of defrauding his employer of more than $4million. He was found guilty of using company funds meant for the refurbishments of Coles Myer stores for his own personal property. This information was discovered by a forensic accountant who analysed invoices finding they were in fact payments to Quinn’s personal contractors (Head, 2017). The accountant acted legally and ethically disclosing unbiased information as it was discovered. I believe the quick and thorough actions of the forensic accountant complying with APES215 contributed greatly to the successful conviction of Brian Quinn.


References


APESB. (2008). APES 215 FORENSIC ACCOUNTING SERVICES.
Head, B. (2017, June 1). Forget CSI - accountants are the new expert witness. Retrieved from In the
Black: https://www.intheblack.com/articles/2017/06/01/accountant-as-expert-witness
Sanchez, M. H., & Zhang, S. W. (2012). The role of the expert witness in accounting fraud cases. Global journal of business research6(1), 103-111.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Labelmakers Case

A forensic accountant’s role in a civil action is usually to draw out information from accounting records and establish relevant facts (Fenton & Isaacs, 2012). In the Labelmakers Group Pty Ltd v LL Force Pty Ltd case two forensic accountants were engaged by each party to examine relevant records and provide reports. They were required to calculate the profit margin, discount rate, loss of profit on paper sales and accounts of profits. The profit margin was calculated to identify losses of sales revenue and to indicate the impact of clients transferring their business away. The discount rate was calculated to be applied in calculating the quantum of the applicant’s losses as a result of the respondents misconduct in order to assist in recognising the resulting damages of each party. The loss of profit on paper sales was calculated to identify the implications of lost business on paper quantity ordered and the revenue from these sales.   Under the accounts of profits, net

Strict/Vicarious Liability

Under strict/vicarious liability an employer can be held liable for the actions of their employees even if the employee engages in criminal or fraudulent behaviour (Smit & Viviers, 2016). In Australia, liability can arise under contract law, tort, criminal law or other statutes (Ryding & Reisz, 2016) . I do agree that making employers liable for their employee’s actions is a great motivation to minimise fraud, bribery and corruption; however, I disagree that it is the only solution. The backhand in a workplace could be that an employer withholds information that might lead to the conviction of an employee in the fear that they will become equally convicted initiating another area of fraud. The Royal Commission produced a report into misconduct in the banking, superannuation and financial services industry that identified types of crime. Vendor fraud was a main issue of the report due to banks charging fees for services that were not provided (Hayne, 2017) . Vica

Risk Management

Risk management is a major component of IT Governance set to protect against fraud, bribery and corruption. Due to the increasing use of IT in all organisations, IT Governance must continuously evolve to manage the increasing need for higher risk management (Pasquini & Galie, 2013) . Accurate IT governance should have the ability to identify, monitor and report on the level at which IT risks are managed along with how much they need to be managed (von Solms, 2005) . HR managers can implement fraud prevention strategies such as top-down control and trust-building practices into their organisation, however these strategies do not address every aspect of fraud, like opportunity (Niehoff & Paul, 2000) . HR managers along with the use of IT Governance can effectively implement controls within an organisation to prevent fraud. COBIT 5 provides guidance through enablers to contribute to the overall governance and management of risk. Processes identify an